Distinctive differences?
"What's the difference between house and techno, and can the two be differentiated?"
Since the mid 90's, I've come up with an answer to the question almost once a year. And rejected the answer at least as many times. Because the question is really hard to define, and the answer as elusive as a Plastikman trance track.
The other day I read the comments to a mix on Soundcloud, where one user clearly stated that "[this track] can't be techno, because it has lyrics." He went on to label it as house instead.
But is there such an easy rule to be made?
Is this track house or techno?
Ambivalent - Rumors (out on Minus)
Or what about this one?
Plastikman - Ask Yourself (out on Minus)
OK, so both can be said to hail from one of the most progressive techno labels, but the question still remains. Is there a difference, and can it be described?
Sure, there was a time when such a clear line could be drawn, when house was a clear sound hailing from Chicago, and techno hailed from Detroit and had a gritty raw sound.
K. Alexi Shelby - All For Lee-Sah (out on Transmat)
Underground Resistance - Final Frontier (out on Underground Resistance)
But wait! If we go back to the beginning of techno - this is what it sounded like:
Audiotech - Techno City (out on Metroplex)
Channel One - Technicolor (out on Metroplex)
And that's not all. There was a few artists that crossed the boundaries between the genres even back then.
Inner City - Good Life (out on 10 Records)
So Kevin Saunderson (one of the original creators of techno) called this style "Tronik House", but it was clearly a techno derivative. And even though it was released on a Virgin sub label, it was too hard for most clubs to play.
So where is the truth? Is there any clear answer, or do I have to keep searching?
You tell me!
Etiketter: http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif